I’ve recently received a handful of questions asking for clarification about rule governing the use of commas with names and titles. Of all the comma rules tested on the ACT, this is probably the subtlest.

The good news is that questions testing this rule don’t show up very often; the bad news is that if you don’t know the rule, these questions can be very tricky to answer.

The other piece of good news, however, is that when names/titles that appear in the middle of a sentence (i.e. not as the first or last words) these questions can be answered using a simple shortcut. Luckily, almost all of the questions testing this rule fall into that category.

The first thing to know is that there are generally only two correct options: two commas, one before and one after the name/title, or no commas at all.

While a comma after the title may be correct on rare occasions (which don’t concern us here), a comma only before a name or title is wrong. If you learned in school that you should automatically put a comma before someone’s name, I’m very sorry to inform you that your teacher was mistaken.

For example:

Perhaps we shouldn’t give up on paper books just yet. One in particular, called

The Drinkable Book, might be a lifesaver. The hardcover with sturdy pages infused

with bacteria-killing silver nanoparticles is a patent-pending water purification system.

The creative mind behind the technology is chemistry student, Theresa Dankovich

of McGill University in Montreal.


B. student Theresa Dankovich,

C. student, Theresa Dankovich,

D. student Theresa Dankovich


Because our only two possible answers are two commas and no commas, C and D are our only possibilities.

Now, we’re going to work from the two-commas option. Why? Because two commas = non-essential clause, a clause that can be removed without affecting the meaning (grammatical and logical) of the sentence. The simplest way to test out whether the commas are necessary is to remove the clause from the sentence:

Crossed out: The creative mind behind the technology is chemistry student…of McGill University in Montreal.

No, this does not make sense. If the sentence does not make sense in context without the name, then no commas are necessary.

Got that? No sense = no commas. That eliminates C, leaving D as the correct answer.


Now try something harder:

On August 17th, the spacecraft, Cassini will make one last close flyby of Saturn’s

pockmarked moon Dione to search for direct evidence that the moon is geologically

alive and active. Cassini, a collaboration between NASA, the European Space Agency

and the Italian Space Agency, has been studying the Saturn system since 2004, and

its grand mission will come to a close in 2017, after the spacecraft makes a series of

dives through the space between the planet and its rings.

(adapted from http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/cassini-makes-final-close-flyby-of-saturn-moon-dione/)


B. spacecraft Cassini,

C. spacecraft, Cassini,

D. spacecraft Cassini


The easiest way to approach this question is to cross the name out and read the sentence without it.

Crossed out: On August 17th, the spacecraft…will make one last close flyby of Saturn’s pockmarked moon Dione to search for direct evidence that the moon is geologically alive and active.

Now be very, very careful. The sentence still makes grammatical sense, but we no longer know which spacecraft the sentence is referring to. The reference to Cassini in the following sentence no longer makes sense. The name is therefore essential, meaning that no commas should be used.

Again, no sense = no commas.